Power, Not Permits: How Private Energy Systems Are Defining U.S. AI Infrastructure Sovereignty
The competition to lead in AI has become a battle for power. Hyperscalers will spend more than $350 billion on infrastructure in 2025, yet the real constraint is not capital but the ability to deliver gigawatt-scale electricity within 12 to 24 months. Federal reforms accelerate site control, but they do not solve generation build times, interconnection queues, or the $64 billion in projects stalled by local opposition. In response, hyperscalers are constructing permanent private energy systems, including dedicated nuclear supply, behind-the-meter thermal assets, and exclusive utility partnerships that operate outside traditional public coordination frameworks.
This paper examines how these private energy strategies are redefining U.S. AI infrastructure sovereignty and what this shift means for national resilience, grid stability, and the future of hyperscale development. It asks a fundamental question the United States has yet to answer: Is AI infrastructure a strategic national capability, or an industrial capability that private actors will build on their own?
Key insights:
Why federal policy accelerates permitting but not power delivery
How private energy systems are scaling outside public oversight
The emerging tradeoff between deployment speed and grid resilience
Why it matters:
Digital infrastructure now underpins every sector of society, from emergency response to AI deployment. Countries that fail to invest in sovereign data centers risk falling behind economically, technologically, and strategically.
Download the full white paper to understand the clear roadmap to securing digital independence in a rapidly shifting world.
Please enter your name and email address to be prompted to download a PDF.